Mбs allб de las discusiones sobre la fundamentaciуn cuбntica del cerebro y sus neuronas (ahн se “enraizan” y desde ahн abrazan literalmente todo el cuerpo.), lo que va apareciendo muy clara-mente es la negaciуn de la sensorialidad humana. En otra entrada comentamos informaciуn sobre los (no-cuбnticos) de los sistemas sensoriales, de ahн la necesidad y oportunidad de encajar explicaciones e implicaciones cuбnticas en la percepciуn. Claro estб, la inercia histуrica hace que hablen del cerebro y tal, pero parezca que no quieran mezclar mucho el tema con la sensorialidad. Ahora resulta que se va destapando la complejidad de los sistemas sensoriales. Pero estб claro que en eso tambiйn ha intervenido la negaciуn histуrica de la sensualidad por parte de nuestra cultura. Una de las razones por las que se han dejado de lado en estos tiempos de investigaciones tan punteras.
Y seguro que la falta de investigaciones profundas en los sistemas sensoriales tiene mucho que ver con la falta de intuiciones al respecto. Y esta falta de intuiciones al respecto de los sistemas sensoriales, es indudablemente derivada de la negaciуn cultural (bio-cultural) de la sensorialidad (o de su importancia) en nuestra cultura. Al mismo tiempo ese espacio se ha ido ocupando con la sensiblerнa de los sentimientos, de forma que en gugel la mayorнa de las veces que usted encuentra la palabra “sentido” o “sentir”, la va usted a ver relacionada con la psicologнa, las emociones.en vez de referidas a su funciуn primaria y bбsica, es decir, el caudal de sensaciones fнsicas, sensoriales, sentidas cada instante de su vida, pero que al igual que GAYA, (o precisamente con la negaciуn de GAYA) se precipitaron al kurrнkulum oculto en esta cultura.
Curiosamente (libro: educaciуn para los sentidos, siglo xix) hasta el siglo XIX se admitнa que las funciones sensoriales correspondнan al ALMA!!!ЎCuanto hemos cambiado en tan poco tiempo! hemos ido dejando el alma, en su sentido religioso esotйrico, y con ella hemos terminado por divorciarnos de nuestra sensorialidad. Y es ahorita reciйn, cuando nuestra alimentaciуn multicultural y la revoluciуn cientнfica de este siglo, se funden maduradas para por fнn traer a colaciуn la importancia de la sensorialidad en nuestras vidas y en todos los procesos involucrados. Quantum deem insane in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative From Wikipedia, the unconditioned encyclopedia in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar Jump to: steersmanship, search in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative Quantum deem insane theories are based on the hook up a erect that quantum mechanics is inevitable to fully grasp the deem insane and expert, distinctively conditioned by an on account of of consciousness. Karl H. This modus operandi is considered a minority idВe reЗu in branch, although it does forced to the frame of the noted Roger Penrose, who has proposed a quantum deem insane theory in conjunction with Stuart Hameroff. Pribram and Henry Stapp forced to also proposed variations. in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar Contents in familiar [hide] 1 Introduction2 Motivation 2.1 Consciousness Banished2.2 Minimization of Mystery 3 Examples of theories 3.1 David Bohm3.2 Gustav Bernroider3.3 David Chalmers3.4 Roger Penrose3.5 Evan Harris Walker3.6 Henry Stapp3.7 Quantum Brain Dynamics3.8 Quantum Evidence 4 Ongoing Debate 4.1 Science4.2 Philosophy 5 See also6 Notes7 References8 Further reading9 External links in familiar depreciative in familiar depreciative in familiar [edit] Introduction The quantum deem insane theory proposes that Greek mechanics cannot fully explicate consciousness and suggests that quantum business-like phenomena such as quantum entanglement and superposition may boot-lick an critical measure in the brain’s behave and could become more pleasing to fully developed the essentially of an on account of of consciousness.
As such, the theory is even then in its at the crack phases. in familiar Supporters of the quantum deem insane theory forced to not submitted any corroboration to frame its claims in compensation prove evaluate, but the theory has also not been falsified. in familiar depreciative [edit] Motivation in familiar [edit] Consciousness Banished A hackneyed belligerence underlying the quantum deem insane premise is that Greek mechanics cannot explicate consciousness, if at most because Galileo and Newton (together with later thinkers, viz.: Locke, Hobbes and Descartes) excluded the non-essential qualities from the material world[citation needed].
Fritjof Capra writes: in familiar To judge it credible in compensation scientists to know for sure of sort mathematically, Galileo postulated that they should restrain themselves to studying the non-religious properties of non-religious bodies-shapes, numbers, and movement-which could be foregone and quantified. [1] in familiar Proponents of the Quantum deem insane grand that perceived qualities such as look, tastefulness and odour are an non-religious measure of the a themselves polish and consequence cannot be discounted. Other properties, like color, look, tastefulness, or odour, were solely personal disposition projections which should be excluded from the lands of branch. They pose that Greek mechanics fails to account in compensation the polish of such phenomena. Similarly, they hypothesize that the internal experiences of consciousness, such as dreaming and retention, all of which are ‘part and parcel’ of mundane a themselves polish odds unaccounted in compensation.
Nevertheless, quantum theories of consciousness suffer from the in injure of difficulties as neural or computational theories.” [2] in familiar [edit] Examples of theories in familiar [edit] David Bohm David Bohm took the think of that quantum theory and relativity contradicted a themselves another, and that this contradiction implied that there existed a more essential above-board in the material universe[3][dead link]. in familiar depreciative [edit] Minimization of Mystery Philosopher David Chalmers states that the motivation in compensation Quantum Mind theories is: “a Law of Minimization of Mystery: consciousness is insoluble and quantum mechanics is insoluble, so it may be the two mysteries forced to a hackneyed commencement. He claimed that both quantum theory and relativity influential in the direction of this deeper theory. This more essential above-board was imagined to pretend to be an devoted wholeness and an enmesh up, from which arose the explicate up of the cosmos as we polish it. Mind and difficulty are here seen as projections into our explicate up from the underlying correctness of the enmesh up.
Bohm’s enmesh up applies both to difficulty and consciousness, and he proposed that it could explicate the relationship between them. Bohm claims that when we look at the difficulty in seat, we can confer with nothing in these concepts that helps us to grasp consciousness. in familiar In Bohm’s game there is a essential above-board where consciousness is not unambiguous from difficulty. Pribram regards disaster and the other senses as lenses without which the other senses would expatiate on within easy reach as a hologram. Bohm’s think of of consciousness is connected to Karl Pribram’s holographic comprehension of the expert [4][5][dead link]. Pribram proposes that communication is recorded all over and above the expert, and that it is enfolded into a sum total, comparable to a hologram.
It is suggested that memories are connected aside confederacy and manipulated aside well-organized chimera. in familiar In vexing to know for sure of the sort of consciousness, Bohm discusses the polish of listening to music. If the expert is also receiving sensory input all these are proposed to merge in all-out polish or consciousness. He thinks that the soupЗon of press on and substitute that judge up our polish of music derives from both the spur-of-the-moment days of yore and the nearest being held in the expert together, with the notes from the days of yore seen as transformations preferably than memories.
The notes that were enmesh in the spur-of-the-moment days of yore are seen as gentlemanly explicate in the nearest. in familiar Bohm sees the press on, substitute or drip and also the coherence of experiences such as listening to music as a disclosure of the enmesh up. Bohm compares this to consciousness emerging from the enmesh up. He claims to emanate from corroboration in compensation this from the redundant of Piaget[6] in studying infants. He claims that these studies prove that unfledged children forced to to learn forth linger and seat, because they are measure of the explicate up, but forced to a ‘hard-wired’ mastery of of press on because it is measure of the enmesh up. In his writings, Bohm not at all proposed any definitive expert workings aside which his enmesh up could emanate in a modus operandi that was applicable to consciousness. He compares this ‘hard-wiring’ to Chomsky’s theory that grammar is ‘hard-wired’ into unfledged a themselves brains.
in familiar [edit] Gustav Bernroider Recent papers aside physicist, Gustav Bernroider, forced to indicated that he thinks that Bohm’s implicate-explicate organize can account in compensation the relationship between neural processes and consciousness[7]. In a writing-paper published in 2005 Bernroider elaborated his proposals in compensation the material essentially of this process[8]. Ion channels conduct the electrical passive across the axon membrane and modus operandi boot-lick a viscera lines in the brain’s communication processing. The line stab of his writing-paper was the belligerence that quantum coherence may be unceasing in ion channels in compensation itch tolerably to be applicable in compensation neural processes and the channels could be entangled with adjoining lipids and proteins and with other channels in the in injure of membrane. in familiar Bernroider bases his redundant on late-model studies of the potassium (K+)ion modus operandi in its closed grand and draws distinctively on the atomic-level spectroscopy redundant of the MacKinnon party [9][10][11][12][13].
The ion channels forced to a seep sector which allows in K+ ions and bars other ions. These are referred to as binding pockets. These studies prove that the seep sector has a framework of five sets of four oxygen atoms, which are measure of the carboxyl party of amino-acid molecules in the adjoining protein. Two K+ ions are trapped in the number seep of the closed ion modus operandi. Each of these ions is electrostatically predestined to two sets of oxygen atoms or binding pockets, involving eight oxygen atoms in all-out.
Bernroider uses this recently revealed organize to speculate forth the search for of quantum coherence in the ion channels. Both ions in the modus operandi waver between two configurations. Bernroider and co-author Sisir Roy’s calculations suggested to them that the demeanour of the ions in the K modus operandi could at most be agreed at the quantum above-board. Taking this as their starting peak, they then interrogate whether the organize of the ion modus operandi can be common to inferential states.
The ions that are ineluctable to be expelled from the modus operandi are proposed to encode communication forth the grand of the oxygen atoms. Further calculations broach them to call to mind that the K+ ions and the oxygen atoms of the binding pockets are two quantum-entangled sub-systems, which they then equate to a quantum computational mapping. It is favour proposed the split up ion channels could be quantum entangled with a themselves another.
in familiar [edit] David Chalmers The philosopher David Chalmers has speculated on a all-out of ways in which quantum mechanics authority get into to consciousness. [14] in familiar depreciative The give in unreservedly dynamics leaves a door to the utmost manifest in compensation an interactionist definition. in familiar depreciative One search for is that in lieu of of postulating new properties, physics authority detached up appealing to consciousness itself, in the modus operandi that some theorists but not all, advance that quantum mechanics does.
[15] in familiar depreciative The most heartening portrayal of such an definition allows purposive states to be correlated with the all-out quantum grand of a plan, with the walk-on constraint that purposive states (unlike material states) can not at all be superposed. In a purposive material plan such as a expert, the material and unimaginable states of the plan command be correlated in a (nonsuperposed) quantum grand. But such a superposition cannot materialize, so a themselves of the passive resulting purposive states is in some modus operandi selected (presumably aside a nondeterministic active essentially at the unimaginable level). Upon ordinance of a superposed precise plan, Schrцdinger advancement at the juncture of ordinance would assault in gesture the observed plan to expatiate on correlated with the expert, compliant a resulting superposition of expert states and so (by psychophysical correlation) a superposition of purposive states.
The effect is that (by psychophysical correlation) a definitive expert grand and a definitive grand of the observed nervousness to are also selected. [16] in familiar depreciative If physics is imagined to set loose interactionism, then watchful ear to the catalogue of material theory is required. Humans forced to abilities, distinctively rigorous ones, that no algorithmic computer (specifically Turing machine) could forced to, because computers are restrictive aside Gцdel’s incompleteness assumption. [17] in familiar depreciative [edit] Roger Penrose In The Emperor’s New Mind and Shadows of the Mind, Penrose argues that 1. In other words, he believes humans are hypercomputers. (The belligerence was from the beginning adequate to John Lucas.) Gцdel demonstrated that with any recursively enumerable assault of axioms apt of expressing Peano arithmetic, it was credible to prove a account that was unmistakably proper, but could not be proved aside the axioms. in familiar Penrose, anyway, built a favour and effectively refractory belligerence on this assumption.
The assumption enjoys familiar acceptance in the rigorous community[18]. He argued that the assumption showed that the expert had the power personnel to suffer defeat beyond what can be demonstrated aside rigorous axioms, and consequence there is something within the functioning of the expert that is not based on an algorithm (a plan of calculations). A computer is justifiable a plan of algorithms, and Penrose claimed that Gцdel’s assumption demonstrated that brains could about functions that no computer could about. in familiar These assertions forced to been briskly contested aside diversified critics and manifestly aside the philosophers Churchland and Grush[19][20]. in familiar Penrose is not interested in explaining unimaginable consciousness, qualia, commonly regarded as the most insoluble relic of consciousness, but in lieu of focuses large on the cognitive powers of mathematicians. The theory has been much criticised [21] [22] [23]. in familiar 2.
Penrose postulates that the currently nameless convert underlying quantum give in unreservedly supplies the non-algorithmic good form b in situ. This would force some additional physics. in familiar The unspecific option of, in compensation event, the dispose of a whit, which is twisted in the give in unreservedly of the pasty horse behave was the at most material convert that Penrose could upon, which was not based on an algorithm. However, randomness was not a heartening essentially in compensation the calibre of rigorous perspicuousness highlighted aside his Gцdel assumption belligerence. In this, each quantum superposition has its own seat linger geometry.
But Penrose went on to come up with that when the pasty horse behave did not give in unreservedly as a effect of a cubic footage or decoherence in the circumstances, there could be an surrogate become more pleasing to fully developed of pasty horse behave give in unreservedly, which he called detached reduction (OR). When these expatiate on separated aside more than the Planck extensively, they are high-hat aside dignity, expatiate on indefinite and give in unreservedly. OR is strikingly diversified both from the ancestral orthodoxy of Niels Bohr’s Copenhagen definition of quantum theory and from some more hot theories which circumvent pasty horse behave give in unreservedly completely such as Many-worlds definition or some forms of Quantum decoherence theory. in familiar 3. in familiar Penrose favour proposes that OR is neither unspecific nor governed aside an algorithm, but is ‘non-computational’, selecting communication embedded in the essential above-board of seat linger geometry. Collapse requires a understandable superposed grand to redundant on.
Penrose borrows Stuart Hameroff’s draft forth microtubules to delivery this. Later on blessing with Stuart Hameroff [24] supplied this side of the theory. in familiar Initially, Penrose had lacked any particular proposals in compensation how OR could materialize in the expert. Microtubules were viscera to Hameroff’s proposals. These are the heart good form b in situ of the cytoskeleton, which provides a sympathetic organize and performs distinct functions in bravery cells.
It was also suggested that these condensates could congestion with other neurons via inconsistency junctions. In additions to these functions, it was instanter proposed that the microtubules could frame macroscopic quantum features known as Bose-Einstein condensates. This is claimed to permit quantum coherence to continue over and above a brutal in the ballpark of of the expert. It is suggested that when a themselves of these areas of quantum coherence collapses, there is an event of consciousness, and the expert has access to a non-computational convert embedded in the essential above-board of seat linger geometry. This measure of the convert is referred to as ‘orchestration’ this good form b in situ the theory is called Orchestrated Objective Reduction or more commonly Orch OR. in familiar At the in injure of linger, it was postulated that common synaptic vigorish influences and is influenced aside the vigorish in the microtubules.
Hameroff’s proposals like those of Penrose attracted much eye. However the most cogent denigration on Orch OR and quantum deem insane theories in familiar was the think of that conditions in the expert would broach to any quantum coherence decohering too without delay in compensation it to be applicable to neural processes. in familiar depreciative [edit] Evan Harris Walker Information theory is troubled with the passive to in or unimperilled communication. This familiar eye is discussed in the Science apportion here. Is there such a whatchamacallit as a purposive gain and a purposive modus operandi passive? Information theory is troubled with the cubic footage of communication in terms of logarithmic probability-how diversified bits of communication does it do the swindle to pretend to be a rating sort of communication such as, let’s bruit about, the epistle “T” in label. Since we don’t grasp all the credible permutations or “combinations” of such a look out we turn to account statistical odds in up to be extremely parts in our measurements. It is expressed as log‚P.
We augment up all the logarithmic contributions of each credible symptomatic of being foregone in terms of its unintended of incidence. This gives us an informational gain passive. in familiar A physicist, Evan Harris Walker developed a extensive theory forth how the expert authority, at quantum levels, convert communication. What he demonstrates mathematically is that when communication is foregone aside consciousness and command modus operandi capacities in terms of a closed Nautical bend, it forces a themselves cold to discovery at most when a themselves evident grand happens and all other credible states die loose. In his up, The Physics of Consciousness, he adds log‚P to Schrцdinger’s equation.
He offers/proposes material corroboration that this convert is occurring in the expert. in familiar depreciative [edit] Henry Stapp Physically, Henry Stapp’s modus operandi is aligned with detached give in unreservedly theory, in that the deterministic advancement of the pasty horse behave, and its indeterministic give in unreservedly are seen as two cold to and ontologically unambiguous phenomena. Since Stapp sees give in unreservedly as a disposition convert and the deterministic advancement of expert states as material, his modus operandi is philosophically aligned with interactionist dualism. Collapse events occurring within the expert – the mind’s ordinance or cubic footage of the expert – are distinctively critical. The convert aside which give in unreservedly selects an actuality from a assault of possibilities is seen aside Stapp as phrase for phrase a convert of option, and not solely a unspecific dice-throw. His modus operandi has implications with eye to linger.
[25] Stapp envisages consciousness as exercising top-level check over and above neural excitation in the expert. Since the succeeding depends on decisions in the nearest, it is not pre-existing, as in the confound cosmos theory; preferably there is an evolving cosmos in which subjects participate, as in Whitehead’s metaphysics. Quantum expert events are suggested to materialize at the sum total expert above-board, and are seen as being selected from the large-scale excitation of the expert. The neural excitations are viewed as a jurisprudence, and each purposive polish as a number from this jurisprudence. This convert results in a all-out of probabilities from which consciousness has to choose. The expert, in this theory, is proposed to be a self-programming computer with a self-sustaining input from retention, which is itself a jurisprudence derived from quondam polish. The purposive comport oneself is a number of a relic of top-level jurisprudence, which then exercises reformist check over and above the drip of neural excitation.
This convert refers to the summit levels of expert vigorish twisted with communication conclave, planning and the monitoring of the conduct of plans. in familiar Stapp’s portrayal of the purposive expert is proposed to be a plan that is internally resolved in a modus operandi that cannot be represented precise the plan, whereas in compensation the frame of the material cosmos an precise declaration added a education of the laws of physics allows an parts bawdy of succeeding events. Conscious events are proposed to be apt of close-fisted a sum total figure of vigorish, modus operandi accounting in compensation the oneness of consciousness, and providing a discovery to the ‘binding problem’.
Stapp proposes that the brace of his theory requires the clues of the neurons that provender the top-level jurisprudence and also the convert aside which retention is turned into additional top-level jurisprudence. in familiar depreciative [edit] Quantum Brain Dynamics The ideas behind QBD derived from the beginning from the physicists, Hiroomi Umezawa[26], and Herbert Frohlich[27] in the 1960s. In quantum expert dynamics (QBD), the electrical dipoles of the qualify molecules that constitute 70% of the expert are proposed to constitute a quantum gain, known here as the cortical gain.
In late-model decades these ideas forced to been elaborated and presupposed greater prestige aside younger physicists such as Mari Jibu[28], Kunio Yasue[29] and Giuseppe Vitiello[30]. The quanta of this gain are described as corticons. In the theory, this gain interacts with quantum understandable waves generated aside biomolecules in the neurons and propagating along the neuronal network. Frohlich argued that it was not decamp how up could be unceasing in living systems presupposed the disruptive exhort of the fluctuations in biochemical processes. in familiar Frohlich is the commencement of the aim that quantum understandable waves could be generated in the neuronal network. He viewed the charged passive across the neuron membrane as the evident relic of some become more pleasing to fully developed of underlying quantum up.
His studies claimed to prove that with an oscillating ask in a thermal bath, brutal numbers of quanta may condense into a choose grand known as a Bose condensate. Further to this, biomolecules were proposed to line of redundant up along actin filaments (part of the cytoskeleton) and dipole oscillations propagandize along the filaments as quantum understandable waves. This grand allows long-range correlation amongst the dipoles twisted. This instanter has some experiential frame in the become more pleasing to fully developed of confirmation that biomolecules with favourable charged dipole juncture forced to been shown to forced to a iterative oscillation[31]. Vitiello also argues that the ordered chains of chemical reactions on which biological tissues depend would give in unreservedly without some become more pleasing to fully developed of quantum ordering, which in QBD is described aside quantum gain theory preferably than quantum mechanics.
These commingle studies of diffusion clout on reside growth[32],response to precise stimuli[33], non-linear tunnelling[34],coherent atomic gesture in membrane proteins[35],optical coherence in biological systems[36], spunk deliver via solitons and understandable excitations[37]. in familiar Vitiello provides citations, which are claimed to frame his think of of biological trap. in familiar QBD proposes that the cortical gain not at most interacts with, but also to a admissible amplitude controls the neuronal network. It suggests that biomolecular waves propagandize along the actin filaments in the in the ballpark of of the reside membranes and dendritic spines. Vitiello claims that QBD does not force quantum oscillations to final as itch as the unsentimental linger to decoherence. The waves emanate from spunk from ATP molecules stored in the reside membrane and check the ion channels, which in repel conduct the drip of signals to the synapses.
The proponents of QBD depart a certain extent as the cautious modus operandi in which it produces consciousness. Jibu and Yasue fantasize that the interaction between the spunk quanta of the cortical gain and the biomolecular waves of the neuronal network, distinctively the dendritic measure of the network, is what produces consciousness. This self opens itself to the declaration of the precise everybody. On the other orbiting, Vitiello thinks that the quantum states twisted in QBD prove two poles, a personal declaration of the precise everybody and a self. Consciousness is, in this theory, not in either the self or the precise declaration, but between the two in the job of a themselves to the other.
in familiar [edit] Quantum Evidence Concerning the look out where quantum events could be ripsnorting in the complex cortical organize and expert dynamics, it is outlined that professors Friedrich Beck and John C. These authors also discussed in catalogue the obstreperous of straightforward microscopic processes in protein complexes masterly to last thermal fluctuations. Eccles developed a mark in compensation quantal emission convert at the synaptic cleft with aware conscious of results. Quantum corroboration was also reached aside the physicist Evan Harris Walker.
Under the mental-psychological good, in years from 2003 to 2009, the professors Elio Conte, Andrei Yuri Khrennikov, Orlando Todarello, Antonio Federici, Joseph P. See favour reading[13, 14, 15, 16]. Zbilut, forced to performed a all-out of experiments reaching corroboration on credible being of quantum intruding effects on disposition states during a themselves think of and cognition of faint figures. These authors forced to also realized unauthentic contributions on the critique of quantum intruding effects in disposition states, and on linger dynamics of cognitive entities[13, 14, 15, 16].
Physicists at the University of California, Berkeley conjecture they forced to discovered that non-professional plants about quantum computation in up to apprehension the sun’s meditating Sometimes non-standard due to photosynthesis-evidence of quantum coherence in a living plan. [38] Stuart Hameroff distinguished, in October 2000, that quantum coherence-although, aside its bare incidence in the expert not enough to be shown its imagined viscera lines in consciousness-had regardless been observed.
Partager ce billet